![]() 12/21/2016 at 01:54 • Filed to: None | ![]() | ![]() |
The sedan has the better proportions (according to most people, I think not), but the coupe has the best butt. The wide hips, & center exhausts make an 11.
![]() 12/21/2016 at 02:02 |
|
Coupe > Sedan
![]() 12/21/2016 at 02:06 |
|
Having the most butt doesn’t mean it has the best butt.
![]() 12/21/2016 at 02:07 |
|
![]() 12/21/2016 at 02:11 |
|
I like wagons, but the CTS body style does not work as a wagon.
![]() 12/21/2016 at 02:13 |
|
It’s the fuckin doors.
![]() 12/21/2016 at 02:15 |
|
A wagon should have glass (c-pillar & back) go father, it’s fucking hatchback with a mega d-pillar.
![]() 12/21/2016 at 02:19 |
|
The fucking USS Kitty Hawk doesn’t have blind spots as big as those d pillars are giving it.
![]() 12/21/2016 at 02:22 |
|
Well yeah, it’s flat on top. You can see everything.
![]() 12/21/2016 at 02:24 |
|
big butts are the best butt.
![]() 12/21/2016 at 02:24 |
|
They do look striking, but it just seems the back of the car is too tall, too flat.
![]() 12/21/2016 at 02:24 |
|
This is a good rebuttal.
![]() 12/21/2016 at 02:26 |
|
I don’t mind a tall back, its like it has nice long legs.
![]() 12/21/2016 at 05:53 |
|
Booty booty booty booty rockin’ everywhere
![]() 12/21/2016 at 07:30 |
|
It also has the worst visibility ever and an obscenely cramped interior for such a large vehicle. I could live with the interior and bad visibility it if it was truly amazing in other ways but the performance is extremely mediocre and the quality is complete garbage.
I literally found nothing redeeming about this car. We had a pool car and I tried over and over but just kept finding excuses not to drive it when it was free to use it.....
![]() 12/21/2016 at 07:52 |
|
It looks awful. It has all the elegance of a 16 ton weight.
![]() 12/21/2016 at 11:16 |
|
![]() 12/21/2016 at 11:31 |
|
Blasphemer!